We commented on Tiller's murder here and on the Salon article regarding O'Reilly's campaign against "Tiller the Baby Killer" here. FYI, here's a compilation of O'Reilly's rhetoric, compiled by his friends at KosTV. Jed Lewison writes:
Since 2005, Bill O’Reilly has waged jihad against Dr. George Tiller, dedicating 29 segments of his show to demonizing and dehumanizing Tiller, who he invariably called "Tiller the baby killer."...
See selected portions after the jump:
Recent Posts
- Conquering a Fear, Quite Out of the Blue
- TPMtv's "The Day in 100 Seconds" (June 1, 2009 Video): General Motors Files for Bankruptcy
- Ronald Reagan, the Consumer Culture, and "The New Frugality"
- Murdered Doctor Target of Campaign by Bill O'Reilly; Meanwhile, Wingnuts Celebrate Success of Domestic Terrorism, While Right-Wing Hypocrites Speedily Try to Distance Themselves
- GM Heading for Bankruptcy
- Is Trauma over 9/11 a Valid Defense to the Bush Administration's Legal Violations or Moral Lapses?
- Pro-Choice Doctor Shot to Death at Church
- Gen. Taguba Hasn't Seen the 44 Abu Ghraib Torture Photos Suppressed by Obama?
- GOP Strategists Who Specialize in "Latino Outreach" Upset by Sotomayor Attacks
- Defense Contractor Involved in Bribery re: Bullet Proof Vest Contract
Tiller performed abortions on babies who would have been viable if born at the moment of the abortion. Most people in this country are opposed to abortion at that stage. In fact, only about 3 doctors in the nation are even willing to perform it. Is it so unreasonable to believe that killing a baby who would be viable outside the womb for no reason other than that the mother does not want the child and claims she will be psychologically harmed if she gives birth to the baby infanticide?
That Bill O'Reilly holds that opinion is at least reasonable. (I think most Americans correctly informed of the facts are appalled by the idea. I bet you will even try to argue against my facts, because even you would agree that there is something wrong with the abortion I have described.) He even (gasp!) holds a constitutional right to talk about it!
Just another example of liberals thinking no one has a right to free speech unless that speech echos their own views.
Posted by: Alexandra Cannon | June 02, 2009 at 09:36 PM