The Alan Grayson Page

The Anthony Weiner Page

Guest Contributors

Note

  • BN-Politics' administrators respect, but do not necessarily endorse, views expressed by our contributors. Our goal is to get the ideas out there. After that, they're on their own.
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 05/2007

Blog Catalog

  • Liberalism Political Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory

Blogorian!

Blogged


« TPMtv's "The Day in 100 Seconds" (June 1, 2009 Video): General Motors Files for Bankruptcy | Main | Conquering a Fear, Quite Out of the Blue »

June 01, 2009

Comments

Alexandra Cannon

Tiller performed abortions on babies who would have been viable if born at the moment of the abortion. Most people in this country are opposed to abortion at that stage. In fact, only about 3 doctors in the nation are even willing to perform it. Is it so unreasonable to believe that killing a baby who would be viable outside the womb for no reason other than that the mother does not want the child and claims she will be psychologically harmed if she gives birth to the baby infanticide?

That Bill O'Reilly holds that opinion is at least reasonable. (I think most Americans correctly informed of the facts are appalled by the idea. I bet you will even try to argue against my facts, because even you would agree that there is something wrong with the abortion I have described.) He even (gasp!) holds a constitutional right to talk about it!

Just another example of liberals thinking no one has a right to free speech unless that speech echos their own views.

The comments to this entry are closed.