by Damozel | Despite the support of Obama and one bank (Citigroup), the Senate voted 45-51 against the bill that would have let bankruptcy judges rewrite -- "cram down" in the vernacular -- mortgage payments for homeowners. (abc news; think progress)
This bill was part and parcel of "a central element" in the Dems' plan to stabilize the economy. (Wash. Independent) Tragically, "[s]everal Democrats, including the newest Democrat, Sen. Arlen Specter of PA, opposed [the bill]."(abc news) "Nays included all Republicans and Baucus, Bennet, Byrd, Carper, Dorgan (?), Johnson, Landrieu, Lincoln, Nelson (NE), Pryor, Specter (awesome!), Tester," dday says. Ryan Grimm at HuffPost discusses the millions in contributions raked in to their campaign coffers by some of those Dems.
And -- wow -- Sen. Dick Durbin is seriously annoyed. Siding with those who don't have "paid lobbyists" and against bankers who "own the place," he slammed the argument being mounted by the banks:
Durbin said on the Senate floor that in negotiations, the banking industry argued that restructuring primary home loans -- secondary home loans and luxury loans for items like yachts can already be restructured by a bankruptcy judge -- would create a moral hazard in this country.
"Senator, you don't understand the moral hazard here," Durbin paraphrased the banking argument. "People have to be held responsible for their wrongdoing. If you make a mistake, darn it, you've got to pay the price. that's what America is all about."
"Really, Mr. Banker on wall street? that's what America is all about?" he railed.
"What price did wall street pay for their miserable decisions, creating rotten portfolios, destroying the credit of America and its businesses?" Durbin said of the $700 billion Wall Street bailout Congress passed, and Durbin supported in the waning days of the Bush administration. "Oh, (the bankers) paid a pretty heavy price. Hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayers' money sent to them to bail them out and put them back in business, even to fund executive bonuses for those guilty of mismanagement. Moral hazard, huh? How can they argue that with a straight face? They do." (abc news)
Major concessions didn't help. (Wash. Independent)
To no avail. Only Citigroup, which endorsed the Senate bill earlier in the year, has signed on in support. And it wasn’t for a lack of concessions from Democrats. Indeed, behind Durbin, Senate leaders diluted the bill so that eligibility applies only to: (1) loans taken out before Jan. 1, 2009; (2) loans that are at least 60 days delinquent; (3) loans with outstanding balances of less than $729,750; and (4) loans for which homeowners were not offered a modification from their servicer — one compatible with either the Obama administration’s new anti-foreclosure plan or the Hope for Homeowners program. Also, the Durbin compromise sunsets the bankruptcy option in 2012.
“It’s a compromise six ways to Sunday to answer everyone’s concerns, and yet you’ve still got what looks like all the Republicans, and a handful of Democrats, who don’t want the bill,” said David Abromowitz, a housing expert at the progressive Center for American Progress. “[The banks] still have enormous political power on Capitol Hill.” (Wash. Independent)
The timing could hardly be worse for homeowners, with foreclosures up 24% from 2008.(Wash. Independent)
Given the tidal wave of foreclosures that have so destabilized our economy, this seems like a no-brainer piece of legislation. There were over 800,000 foreclosures in the first three months of 2009 -- more than 341,000 in March alone.
Obama ain't happy.
One of which is the potent banking lobby. So anyway, the rich guys won and are breaking out the champagne. No, really. Think Progress reports:
How do they get away with it? Arianna Huffington asks why banks "are still being treated as beltway royalty?" Dday says: "[T]hey fund the campaigns, they throw the best parties, they share the interests and perspective of those disproportionately wealthy politicians." In this oligarchy masquerading as a democracy, the banks therefore have disproproportionate power.
Ryan Grimm thinks that the defeat of this measure will ultimately be detrimental to banks and not just to homeowners.
RECENT BUCK NAKED POLITICS
Tales of the Torture Administration Continued: The $1000 a Day Psychologists Who Allegedly Enabled the Use of Waterboarding
Colbert Report: Donkey Flu Claims Specter as Victim
SUPREME COURT JUSTICE DAVID SOUTER TO RETIRE
Big Tent O' Snark: Obama's Obamamania?; The GOP Digs for the Pony; Scenes from Lindsay Lohan's Coloring Book; Bill Clinton Steps Up; Asshattery; Optional Education; and The Bad Palin Lolling on a Bearskin
Laughing Them Out of the Bank: Citigroup Wants to Give Bonuses?
Bank of America Publicity Stunt: Lewis off the Board but Still CEO
Buck Naked Snark: The Spanish Inquisition; the Welfare of Gov. Rick Perry; Arlen Specter, Enabler of the Flailing Caucus of the Batshit Crazy; Creed & The Armies of the Night; a Helpful Hint for Gordon Brown; Bad Euphemisms for Murder
Good Bloggin': Obama's First 100 Days; Specter's Change of Allegiance; Bachmann Doesn't Exactly Say Obama Caused Swine Flu; Hate Crimes; the GOP Legacy; & One Stupendous Act of Sheer Self-Servingness
Jon Stewart on the Jane Harman Scandal ("This Conversation Does Not Exist")
The U S Government has already done way too much over the past 4 months. Unfortunately the train has left the station and these folks will continue spending until there is no one left to tax.
Posted by: arizona bankruptcy lawyer | June 02, 2009 at 11:12 AM
Not sure if it makes a lot of sense to me but it looks like you're having fun.
Posted by: Credit Card Debt Forgiveness | November 20, 2010 at 10:09 PM
Great job...sure his to see you having fun.
Posted by: Unfiled Tax Returns | July 15, 2011 at 01:49 PM