by Damozel | According to Politico, Grassley then of course had to explain that he isn't literally calling for mass suicides all round: he just wants to see a culture of "shame and responsibility." The loud bitter post-partisan laughter you hear from stage left is coming from me: watching yet another Republican do what Republicans do when they see the consequences of their irresponsibility play out: get extremely -- and uselessly -- "enraged." Yes, if the monster you helped to create rampages out of control and starts wreaking havoc on the countryside, just grab a pitchfork and run after him. Everyone will take you for just another outraged victim and not an accessory before the fact.
Meanwhile, one taxpayer-dollar-compensated senior exec at AIG is worried about the "mob effect....putting people's lives in danger." (WaPo) Ah yes, it's the mob effect at fault. I see. Individual greed doesn't have a thing to do with it. It doesn't seem to cross their minds that they could, you know, just refuse or give back the money. Get this guy:
See...see what you don't understand is that AIG and the executives didn't have a choice. They had to pay out and accept these bonuses or dire consequences would ensue. "AIG would face costly lawsuits and be subject to penalties from states and foreign governments. Administration officials said over the weekend that they agreed with that assessment," WaPo solemnly avers.
But if it would help these frightened execs, I can tell them exactly what would stop the rising tide of public outrage: give it back to the company, every taxpayer-funded penny of it, as Deb suggested here, along with a written disclaimer of any right to sue AIG or anyone else. I'm sure someone in the Treasury could work it out so that they don't have to pay tax on what they didn't keep. As for state and foreign penalties, those could surely be negotiated.
Of course, all this should have been anticipated and dealt with back in the days when Henry Paulson was telling us that only a massive and immediate transfusion of taxpayer blood could save the financial industry from death.
So here's the outcome: zombie institutions lurching round the countryside howling for more blood so they can go on staying alive. What are they going to do when we're all tapped out?
Meanwhile, the Obama administration is caught between the zombies and the cliff's edge. Well, he did want the job. It's a bit late in the day for him to complain that he didn't know the deal included zombies.
RECENT BUCK NAKED POLITICS POSTINGS
New Times in El Salvador
Tales of the Torture Administration: What Happened at the CIA Black Sites?
Econ4u on how Much Money Cramer Might Have Lost You
Stewart v. Cramer: Jon Sums up CNBC and Wall Street, Jim Appears Humbly Apologetic
A Turning Point in Journalism History? Reactions to Stewart versus Cramer
Stewart vs. Cramer: The Whole Uncensored Interview
CNBC and Financial Television: Puppets in the Pre-Meltdown Show
From the Back of His Winged Unicorn of Hope, Obama Promises that The Economy Ain't As Bad as It Seems (w/ Bonus Cynical Cartoon)
Politicians Still Dancing for Banks: Citigroup's History of Messing up and Getting Taxpayer Bailouts
thanks for the information on this blog! I find it very interesting and entertaining! hopefully soon have updates that I love your post! I thank you too!
http://www.xlpharmacy.com/viagra/online.php
http://www.xlpharmacy.com/viagra/generic.php
Posted by: buy viagra | May 28, 2010 at 11:29 AM