Was Bush Bad for our Nation's Economy?

He certainly seems to have been.  Check out what today's Washington Post says:

"President Bush has presided over the weakest eight-year span for the U.S. economy in decades, according to an analysis of key data, and economists across the ideological spectrum increasingly view his two terms as a time of little progress on the nation's thorniest fiscal challenges.

"The number of jobs in the nation increased by about 2 percent during Bush's tenure, the most tepid growth over any eight-year span since data collection began seven decades ago. Gross domestic product, a broad measure of economic output, grew at the slowest pace for a period of that length since the Truman administration. And Americans' incomes grew more slowly than in any presidency since the 1960s, other than that of Bush's father.

"Bush and his aides are quick to point out that they oversaw 52 straight months of job growth in the middle of this decade, and that the economy expanded at a steady clip from 2003 to 2007. But economists, including some former advisers to Bush, say it increasingly looks as if the nation's economic expansion was driven to a large degree by the interrelated booms in the housing market, consumer spending and financial markets. Those booms, which the Bush administration encouraged with the idea of an 'ownership society,' have proved unsustainable...."

The Post article goes into more detail, and you can read it here.

Other Buck Naked Politics Posts:

* GOP Hawks Become "Deficit Hawks" Again

* Bailouts: Rep. Frank's Sensible but not so Modest Proposal

* Real Bonuses Based on Fake Profits

* Cleaning up Political & Corporate Culture Could Help Economy

.

Comments

[Charles]

I always say that Republicans are great for the economy, but they're just too expensive. Bush 43 ran up about $5 Trillion in debt, Bush 41 ran up about $2 Trillion in debt, and Reagan added a Trillion, which was a lot of money in those days.

And when Republicans inevitably fall back on excuses (the mess Carter left, the war on terror, and so on), I say, yes, Republicans are just d--n unlucky.

So, elect Democrats, because they're lucky and not too expensive.

It saves a lot on arguments.

[Deb]

Hi charles,

Happy new year. You're too funny.