Think Progress has a video clip of still-President Bush admitting during a Fox interview yesterday that he essentially approved the torture of "9/11 mastermind" Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and claimed that the interrogators got solid information from the torture sessions.
According to Think Progress's linky comments, that's not exactly true:
"What’s more, a former Pentagon intelligence analyst told Vanity Fair that 'K.S.M. produced no actionable intelligence'; another former CIA official, who read all the reports from KSM’s interrogation, said, '90 percent of it was total f*cking bullsh*t.”" (TP)
Torture is against federal law (18 U.S.C 2340 & 2341), and some military and intelligence experts have found it ineffective, to boot.
The illegality and lack of effectiveness begs the question: why were President Bush and many of his underlings so gung-ho on torture?
Memeorandum has commentary.
Other Buck Naked Politics Posts:
* GOP Hawks Become "Deficit Hawks" Again
* Bailouts: Rep. Frank's Sensible but not so Modest Proposal
* Real Bonuses Based on Fake Profits
* Cleaning up Political & Corporate Culture Could Help Economy
.
Comments