by Damozel | Deb Cupples wrote about Franken's expected challenge to the exclusion of 12,000 ballots. In the meantime, he's also picked up more votes. The Minnesota Star Tribune (via Memeorandum) reports:
Will the pendulum swing in Franken's favor?
According to The Hill, "Minnesota law says absentee ballots can only be rejected based on name and address discrepancies, if the voter’s signature is not valid, if the voter is not registered to vote or if the voter already cast a ballot, either in person or by absentee ballot.
The fifth category, Ritchie's office said, could also include absentee ballots rejected for reasons that were "not based on factual information."
Ritchie's office, while stressing that the ballots be examined but not counted, asked that the task be completed by Dec. 18.
The move appeared to give at least some new life to the Franken campaign's longstanding effort to add to the recount what it estimates are as many as 1,000 improperly rejected absentee ballots. (MST)
TPM points out that this may show that "[Ritchie's] office is taking seriously the Franken camp's contention that roughly 1,000 absentee ballots may have been wrongly thrown out by clerical errors, and should be re-admitted." Though they concede there is another potential explanation: "he's just diligently preparing for the inevitable litigation over this matter." (TPM)
The Star Tribune says that Coleman is leading by 305 points. But TPM argues that 'this number has the flaw of taking all challenged ballots out of the count completely until the canvassing board adjudicates them, and there are about 20 times more challenged ballots than the apparent Coleman lead." In other words, Coleman's lead was computed by assuming that all challenged ballots will remain uncounted. The Franken camp estimates that Coleman is ahead by 50 votes.
But, TPM cautions:
Nate Silver earlier had Coleman as a slight favorite. Now he is not so sure.
He notes that Franken's methodology for determining his lead are probably closer to accurate than the Secretary of States."
I have also had conversations with senior Franken officials and been quoted similar numbers, and believe there is strong reason to regard the Franken campaign's claims as credible -- they are tracking every challenged ballot in every precinct, and have far more information about the nature of ballot challenges than is publicly available. (FiveThirtyEight.com)
Furthermore, Franken's net gain of 37 votes "is a very big deal" and "makes a huge amount of difference in a race that could easily be
decided by a small, double-digit margin."
Finally, Silver concedes that Secretary of State Ritchie's instruction to review the absentee ballots "potentially (although far from certainly) a
precursor to those ballots actually being counted, a process which we
estimated would result in a net gain of 25 to 100 votes for Franken (the Franken campaign believes a similar number of ballots are at stake)."
He concludes:
It's clearly far from over. As Todd Beeton says, the reality is that "once all votes are counted and recounted, this thing may not be close to over; this Senate race is likely to go to the courts or even to the US Senate."
RECENT BUCK NAKED POLITICS POSTINGS
Jeb Bush Thinking of Senate Run: Hasn't the Bush Family Done Enough to us Taxpayers?
Telecom Amnesty Challenged in Court: Bush Lawyer Said Obama Would Support it
Does 1,000 Spankings or Beatings Justify Killing Abusers?
Our President Says the Darndest Things
Comments