by Deb Cupples | We taxpayers give more than $2 billion a year to the U.S. Food & Drug Administration to do its job -- i.e., to protect our health by ensuring that foods and drugs are safe.
Sadly, in part due to whistle blowers and the persistent efforts of Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), we've repeatedly seen evidence that the (FDA) has repeatedly opted to not protect us consumers (see e.g., the FDA's part in scandals involving Viagra, Vioxx, Avandia, and Ketek).
It's not just drugs anymore. Apparently, the FDA failed to inform the public after finding evidence that some popular baby formulas contain toxic chemicals. The Washington Post reports:
"Public health groups, consumer advocates and members of Congress blasted the Food and Drug Administration yesterday for failing to act after discovering trace amounts of the industrial chemical melamine in baby formula sold in the United States.
"'This FDA, this Bush administration, instead of protecting the public health, is protecting industry,' said Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), who chairs the Appropriations subcommittee that oversees the FDA budget. In an interview, DeLauro said she wants the agency to disclose its findings and to develop a plan to remove melamine from formula. 'We're talking about babies, about the most vulnerable. This really makes me angry.'"
"The FDA found melamine and cyanuric acid, a related chemical, in samples of baby formula made by major U.S. manufacturers. Melamine can cause kidney and bladder stones and, in worst cases, kidney failure and death. If melamine and cyanuric acid combine, they can form round yellow crystals that can also damage kidneys and destroy renal function.
"Melamine was found in Good Start Supreme Infant Formula With Iron made by Nestle, and cyanuric acid was detected in Enfamil Lipil With Iron infant formula powder made by Mead Johnson. A spokesman for Nestle did not respond to repeated calls and e-mails for comment yesterday....
"The FDA collected 87 samples of infant formula made by American manufacturers, tested all but 10 of them and held a conference call Monday with manufacturers to alert them to the preliminary findings, FDA spokeswoman Judy Leon said. She said she did not know when the agency was planning to inform the public.
"The test results were unearthed by the Associated Press, which had filed a request for records under the Freedom of Information Act."
Why inform the public about such potential dangers? Wouldn't that hurt baby-formula sales? God knows we can't let that happen -- especially with our nation's economy poised on the cliff's edge.
Yes, I'm being ironic, so please don't call me heartless.
Is it any wonder that the FDA has such a terrible image? Ironically, the Washington Post reported in October that the FDA committed $300,000 to hiring a DC public-relations firm to polish the FDA's image.
It gets worse. The official in charge of hiring the contractor found a way around the competitive- bidding process so he could funnel the money to a firm with ties to that official.
Yeah, I do have problems with taxpayer-funded officials funneling tax dollars to their friends and violating federal regulations in the process.
But let's get down to the root issue: instead of spending 300,000 tax dollars on spinning the FDA's deservedly bad image, why don't the people running the FDA instead start actually doing their job -- and actually earning a good reputation?
Other Buck Naked Politics Posts:
* Potato-Potawto: AIG Scraps Bonuses But Gives Retention Pay
* NBC Keeps Using Military "Analyst" with Financial Interests in War
* Bush's 11th Hour Rush to Pass Regulation Obama Opposes
* Someone Please Take the Economy Away from Mr. Paulson
* Save Jobs by Cutting Executive Pay
.
Too many drugs and products have come to market bearing pedigrees which imply that they've been clinically tested, through peer review, and through rigorous FDA evaluation. And then after millions of people use the product, it proves dangerous or even deadly. Bummer!
Posted by: Ajlouny | May 25, 2009 at 11:51 PM
A toxic chemical used to seal glass jars of baby food has been seeping into the product.
Manufacturers have been ordered to ensure that the contamination is reduced.
Posted by: Term Papers | January 29, 2010 at 01:31 AM
I am beginning to really lose all faith and credibility in the FDA. It seems to me that instead of focusing their efforts on protecting the general public they are in-turn being influenced by corporate agenda and special interest. I take everything they say with a grain of salt.
Posted by: e cigarette | February 11, 2010 at 03:43 PM
Hello ohh no that is terrible toxic baby food i can believe it how i¡this can happened there is no people check up this ,we need to make new regulations against this type of situations .
Posted by: Buy viagra | July 13, 2010 at 01:00 PM
i think that the media need to mind their own business and not pry into the sex lives and private lives of famous people. I am sure if they became famous they would not want that plasters everywhere for the world to see their private lives.
Posted by: Generic Viagra | September 17, 2010 at 10:42 PM
Im really beginning to believe to what is happening right now in the government.
Posted by: laboratory freezers | October 18, 2011 at 01:58 AM
It is injustice that baby food with toxic chemicals. This is not fair. Arrange the scrutiny of those companies who mixed toxic chemical with baby food.
Posted by: פתרונות אחסון | November 29, 2011 at 02:55 PM