The Alan Grayson Page

The Anthony Weiner Page

Guest Contributors


  • BN-Politics' administrators respect, but do not necessarily endorse, views expressed by our contributors. Our goal is to get the ideas out there. After that, they're on their own.
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 05/2007

Blog Catalog

  • Liberalism Political Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory



« VP Debate Success: Palin Avoids Appearing 100% Moronic! | Main | They think we're stupid »

October 03, 2008


Close Observer

Did Obama rehearse for his debate last week? He spend five days preparing for the debate, memorizing the slogans written by David Axelrod. Why the different standard for Palin? And certainly you were aware that last week everyone acknowledged that Obama had "low expectations" for his debate because foreign policy was not his forte. Again, different standards.

I'll grant you that Obama can speak in complete sentences but only when he's reading script from the teleprompter, he's saying "uh" more than saying "change."

Here's Barack "Complete Sentences" Obama speaking without the teleprompter (begins at 48 second mark):

I doubt you'll comment on it because it doesn't fit your template. So he reads eloquently from a teleprompter but stutters and stammers extemporaneously ... and you're mesmerized!

Close Observer

Oops. Wrong link. The stuttering obama series is ... well ... let's just say it's a target rich environment. Here's the correct one - an impromptu response to a question; he begins at second 48.

We all know he is incredibly inexperienced to be President, but what does this say about his intelligence?



Not every woman is strong and I wouldn't vote for a candidate just because she is a woman. And my point---which you missed---was that she succeeded in stringing together her substance-free remarks into complete sentences which: good for Sarah.

She's still wrong, ridiculous, and a sign of the depths to which the GOP has plummeted by following its previous policy of offering us sock puppets for the corporatists who have destroyed our economy. By now, even the credulous can see the strings working and Palin's "folksy" mannerisms---gosh darn it!--evoke no one more sharply than George W. Bush.

I don't have a "template." Obama wasn't my first choice for the nomination and there was a time before he rolled over on torture [back in Jan.] when--still believing in the McCain mythos---I might have said, "For a Republican, he's not THAT bad.'

Obama might occasionally stutter. The difference between him and Palin in vast and unbridgeable. It is the difference between a person who worked his way to becoming editor of the Harvard Law Review and a teacher of constitutional law....and Sarah Palin. He knows things a president needs to know. She doesn't even know things a governor of a thinly populated state ought to know.

Palin should be a deal-breaker for any "close observer."

Yes, Obama has his failings. But they are nothing compared to the horrifying prospect of being stuck with the Palin puppet---because her speech showed that she knows NOTHING--- as president.

The comments to this entry are closed.