BN-Politics' administrators respect, but do not necessarily endorse, views expressed by our contributors. Our goal is to get the ideas out there. After that, they're on their own.
Posted by Damozel | The young man described below was speaking to reporters from The Independent with the encouragement of
Yehuda Shaul, "a founder of Shovrim Shtika, or Breaking the Silence....which will publish tomorrow the disturbing testimonies of 39 Israelis....who served in the army in Hebron between
2005 and 2007. " (The Independent)
Posted by Damozel | Why isn't this story all over the news? Why are we talking about anything else? It's the very same weekend when Bush blandly confirmed that oh yeah, he knew all about it? Why aren't he and Cheney and the whole crew about to be impeached? Have the wheels of justice really rusted to a complete stop? Are we really so cynical that we're past being shocked or thinking there's anything we can do about this?
I thought I was long past the point of being shocked at anything the
Bush administration did. They suspended the constitution after 9/11 and
set forth a series of legal opinions that said the president can do
anything he deems necessary to "protect the country." Once you truly
absorb that fact, it's hard to be emotionally affected by anything else
you learn.
Posted by Damozel | Did you know that George W. Bush is still president? It's true.
And while the Dems were sniping at one another last week, we learned that the top officials in the Bush Administration not only approved but specifically authorized the use of torture in the interrogation of terror suspects.(BN-Politics) Cheney, Powell, Ashcroft, Rumsfeld, Rice, Powell, and Tenet all were named as participants in these discussions. (BN-Politics) ("Why are we talking about this in the White House? History will not
judge this kindly," Ashcroft worried.
(ABC News)) But Bush's name was not listed among those present and in fact, they took care to "insulate" him. (AP)
Posted by Damozel | Did anyone ever doubt that certain top administration officials were involved every step of the way in authorizing the interrogation techniques used on al-Qaeda? Most of the people I know certainly thought so.
Everyone, in fact, except my mom. So I am not surprised, though somehow I am quite shocked. There is quite a bit of difference between 'knowing' and knowing. And now the 'highly placed sources' have come out of the woodwork. What took you so long, highly placed sources?
"President Bush today will veto legislation meant to ban the CIA from using waterboarding and other harsh interrogation tactics and will
argue that the agency needs to use tougher methods than the U.S. military to wrest information from terrorism suspects, administration officials said....
"'The bill would take away one of the most valuable tools on the war on
terror: the CIA program to detain and question key terrorist leaders
and operatives,' White House spokesman tony Fratto said yesterday."
There are a couple of problems with what Mr. Fratto is saying on Mr. Bush's behalf.