BN-Politics' administrators respect, but do not necessarily endorse, views expressed by our contributors. Our goal is to get the ideas out there. After that, they're on their own.
by Teh Nutroots | To be fair, he doesn't actually excommunicate them or anything---just says that, having cooperated with "intrinsic evil," they need to do penance. The Priest, who can't have been paying close attention, says that Obama is the most radical "pro-abortion politician" ever. (YN) As for me, I've never met anyone who is pro-abortion; most Americans I know just think that the Catholic church doesn't get to decide for people who are not members when life begins and what God's opinion is on abortion. In other words, they are pro-choice. I myself am anti-abortion but completely pro-choice. They are not mutually exclusive.
Let us hope we see a bit more separation between church and state in the coming years. Confusing a religious conviction with a political principle is the first step on the road to theocracy.
by Damozel & Nicholas | If you looked at some of the right-wing blogs we read for laughs you'd never know this, but it seems that a large number of Americans are relieved to find the government in the control of the Democratic party---at least according to a CNN poll. It appears, in fact---to quote Bob Fertik at Democrats.com---that "[t]he Republican mantra that America is a center-right country that doesn't want Obama's agenda to succeed is one more Big Lie."
by Damozel | Whatever these ladies' differences---and we all know Michelle Obama was never a Hillary fan---Michelle knows Hillary understands the problem of sheltering one's young from the "media maelstrom." (Politico)
by Teh Nutroots| You know what's effing crazy? The fact that McCain, the muppets at The Corner and other formerly respectable bastions of the right, have forgotten that before
911 there was the Oklahoma City bombing, Timothy McVeigh, and a hell of a scary movement among paramilitary anti-government white supremacist militias to bring down the US government.
It's time to demand that Palin and McCain step up and issue a global retraction of their incendiary implications---and outright misreprentations--about President-Elect Obama. After noting the angry shouts and mutterings that characterized many of her rallies, Tim Shipman of The Telegraph reports:
by Damozel | Deb discussed the Coleman-Franken stand-off here. Norm Coleman now leads Al Franken by only 221 votes. (TwinCities.com) According to MPR, it is the closest Senate race in the nation's history.
Minnesota uses optical scan ballots. (TNR) A large majority of ballots with no candidate marked in their Senate race were marked for Obama. A recount would require the ballots to be checked by hand for mismarking. (StarTribune.com)
Naturally, the candidates are scrutinizing every vote. Now Coleman has tried---unsuccessfully--- to prevent the opening of 32 absentee ballots that didn't get opened on election day. (TwinCities.com)
by Damozel | It's nice to see that America finally did something to make the rest of the world happy. All around the world, people celebrated, and are still celebrating, the election of Barack Obama. This one's definitely worth clicking on and scrolling.
On a related note, also Arianna Huffington discussing Obama's win on BBC News' Newsnight with Thomas Friedman and Christopher Hitchens. (Hitch--who endorsed Obama--expresses certain reservations about all this Obama love and jubilation.)
by Teh Nutroots | First of all, what about the rumors that the anti-Palin movement was initiated by supporters of Romney who saw her as a 2012 threat? Ambinder musters them and debunks them, sort of. Whoever started the Palin blame-game, it can't be laid at the door of the Romney faction (or not exclusively).
Meanwhile, Palin is complaining about the cruelty and cowardice of her critics.
Gov. Sarah Palin
of Alaska fired back Friday at the unnamed McCain campaign aides who
have been maligning her in recent days, saying that their criticism was
“cruel and it’s mean-spirited, it’s immature, it’s unprofessional, and
those guys are jerks.” (NYT; emphasis added)
After all is said and done, I am astonished that he expected, or so it seems, that there should be no consequences to the things he said and did to stop people from voting for Obama. But apparently he did expect it---if one is to believe the New York Daily News.
Oh, Joe Lieberman: Really? Because you didn't just insult nominee Barack Obama with the intention of benefiting the Republican contender: you insulted the integrity and good faith of all your colleagues in the entireparty and the humble constituents who selected them.
by Damozel | Okay, right: as far as I'm concerned this was the most entertaining clip of all the clips from the entire evening from any network. Watch Vidal in action, free of any boring middle class inhibitions about coming across as gracious or conciliatory on the telly! "Mad as a box of frogs," remarks the guy who posted it and he's not wrong.
This is one why Americans should never watch anything but BBC News via BBC America. Anchor David Dimbleby was awesome too, both during (meekly and bemusedly and humorously submitting to being schooled by one cranky old lefty curmudgeon) and afterward ("Well, that was fun!") BTW, Vidal's right about the Brits getting it wrong by associating Republicans with British conservative (who would be moderates here, if not liberals). The GOP: It's not a party, it's a mind-set!
For years conservatives have been saying that racism doesn’t exist
anymore. The election of Barack Obama proves we were right all along.
Throughout the campaign we reminded people at every opportunity that
while it might be frightening that Obama is a socialist who pals around
with terrorists, probably wasn’t born in this country and is secretly a
Muslim, it made no difference whatsoever that he was black.... [I]n the end no matter what we threw at Obama, white people voted for him anyway. So with the election of Obama conservatives have been vindicated.
by Damozel | Earlier Teh Nutroots wrote about Reid's summoning of Lieberman to the woodshed. According to HuffPost's Nico Pitney, Reid wants Leiberman out and Leiberman's only shot at keeping his committee chair "appears to be lobbying members of the Senate Democratic Leadership
besides Reid. One key target would be the Senate Democratic Steering
and Outreach Committee, a group of nearly two dozen Democratic Senators who play a role in deciding committee seats." Pitney suggests that this isn't likely to work. "[I]t is highly unlikely that Democrats would act against the wishes of Majority Leader Reid." Not to mention their own. In fact, many of us among the rank-and-file have speculated that Reid really isn't that set on seeing the back of Joe Lieberman. There are political reasons for Reid to want to keep him around.
by Teh Nutroots | Times may be dark, my friends, and Bush might still be president, but the comical finger-pointing and red-faced apoplectic screaming among former allies of the far right seems bound to continue for yet awhile. Let's have a round of very slow clapping for our perpetually furious friends on the far right!
All the stories about Palin's wardrobe? Turns out---that is, if you want to believe Politico's Jonathan Martin, and you betcha I do---that it was all true, and much worse than you probably thought:
by Teh Nutroots | Ha, ha, this is rich. Right wing bloggers are masters of the maladroit reframe and the transparent revisionism. From the conduct of the loons at The Corner and as illustrated elsewhere, one can distill their entire M.O. and fit it into a nutshell. A wing-nutshell.
by Teh Nutroots | So it seems. But will Lieberman get spanked? Does it surprise you as much as it does me that we have to wait and see?
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will likely meet later this week
with Joe Lieberman to discuss whether the Democrat-turned-Independent
will be stripped of his Senate committee chairmanship, a senior
Democratic leadership aide tells CNN.
Lieberman currently chairs the Senate's Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. (CNN)
by Deb Cupples| If ever there were a night worthy of bubbles, it was last night. So, I opened a bottle of champagne and fixed a mimosa. I didn't sip it straight, because I needed my RDA of vitamin C.
We Americans made history last night by electing our first black president, but it's far more than that. Americans have awakened, horrified by what they've grown accustomed to over the last eight years, and they've roared their demand for changes in how America does business.
by Deb Cupples| Watching last night's election returns on ABC TV was about as disgusting as the thought of chugging a pint of rancid, liquefied lard. Maybe more so.
I started watching the election returns at about 7:30 pm. By 9:00 or so, ABC said that Obama had 200 electoral votes, indicating that he was well on his way to winning. Then I went to ABC's electoral map on the Internet. What did I find?
That ABC was predicting the winner (i.e., giving out electoral votes to a candidate) for states that had reported as few as 1% of votes. One-percent? Does anyone with any knowledge of statistics think that one-percent is reflective of an entire state's population -- especially states with distinct red and blue pockets?
I have tears in my eyes. I am thrilled I lived to see this---such a diverse crowd celebrating this historic occasion. I'm listening now to a tearful-sounding Tracy Chapman talking to the BBC America pundits! What a wonderful moment.
This photo is by realjameso16 [used pursuant to a Creative Commons license]. The photo page (showing the license) is here. Please do not copy or use this photograph without consulting--and complying with--the terms of the applicable license.
by Teh Nutroots | To be fair, he doesn't actually excommunicate them or anything---just says that, having cooperated with "intrinsic evil," they need to do penance. The Priest, who can't have been paying close attention, says that Obama is the most radical "pro-abortion politician" ever. (YN) As for me, I've never met anyone who is pro-abortion; most Americans I know just think that the Catholic church doesn't get to decide for people who are not members when life begins and what God's opinion is on abortion. In other words, they are pro-choice. I myself am anti-abortion but completely pro-choice. They are not mutually exclusive.
by Damozel | Whatever these ladies' differences---and we all know Michelle Obama was never a Hillary fan---Michelle knows Hillary understands the problem of sheltering one's young from the "media maelstrom." (
by Teh Nutroots| You know what's effing crazy? The fact that McCain, the muppets at The Corner and other formerly respectable bastions of the right, have forgotten that before
911 there was the 
by Damozel | Deb discussed the Coleman-Franken stand-off 
by Damozel | It's nice to see that America finally did something to make the rest of the world 
by Teh Nutroots | First of all, what about the rumors that the anti-Palin movement was initiated by supporters of Romney who saw her as a 2012 threat? Ambinder 
by Damozel | And they can have him. 
by Damozel | Okay, right: as far as I'm concerned this was the most entertaining clip of all the clips from the entire evening from any network. Watch Vidal in action, free of any boring middle class inhibitions about coming across as gracious or conciliatory on the telly! "
by Damozel | Earlier Teh Nutroots wrote about Reid's summoning of Lieberman 
by Teh Nutroots | Times may be dark, my friends, and Bush might still be president, but the comical finger-pointing and red-faced apoplectic screaming among former allies of the far right seems bound to continue for yet awhile. Let's have a round of very slow clapping for our perpetually furious friends on the far right!
by Teh Nutroots | Ha, ha, this is rich. Right wing bloggers are masters of the maladroit reframe and the transparent revisionism. From the conduct of the loons at The Corner and as illustrated elsewhere, one can distill their entire M.O. and fit it into a nutshell. A wing-nutshell. 
by Teh Nutroots | So it seems. But will Lieberman get spanked? Does it surprise you as much as it does me that we have to wait and see?
